SON vs. TROW
SON (Sonoco Products Company) and TROW (T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.) are both stocks. SON operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while TROW operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SON returned 3.44%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for TROW. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SON vs. TROW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SON achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than TROW's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SON has underperformed TROW with an annualized return of 3.44%, while TROW has yielded a comparatively higher 7.29% annualized return.
SON
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 11.82%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- -4.18%
- 5Y*
- -3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
TROW
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 6.03%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- -7.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
SON vs. TROW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SON Sonoco Products Company | 11.82% | -6.30% | -9.12% | -4.69% | 8.30% | 0.53% | -0.73% | 19.53% | 3.06% | 3.92% |
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 6.03% | -4.67% | 9.68% | 3.35% | -42.24% | 34.91% | 28.11% | 35.61% | -9.75% | 43.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SON and TROW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 1989 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
SON:
$4.77B
TROW:
$23.27B
SON:
$10.39
TROW:
$9.80
SON:
4.60
TROW:
10.92
SON:
0.64
TROW:
3.18
SON:
1.33
TROW:
2.16
SON:
$7.49B
TROW:
$7.41B
SON:
$1.57B
TROW:
$3.66B
SON:
$1.40B
TROW:
$2.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SON vs. TROW — Risk / Return Rank
SON
TROW
SON vs. TROW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonoco Products Company (SON) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SON | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.03 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 2.52 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SON | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.85 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.24 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.24 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.39 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
SON vs. TROW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SON drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TROW drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SON and TROW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SON | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.36% | -67.43% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.40% | -19.76% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.46% | -34.05% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.94% | -58.16% | +25.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.57% | -58.16% | +16.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.48% | -41.24% | +24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -16.67% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 8.03% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SON vs. TROW - Volatility Comparison
Sonoco Products Company (SON) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) at 5.56%. This indicates that SON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TROW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SON | TROW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 5.56% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.70% | 17.35% | +9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.04% | 23.75% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 30.47% | -4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 30.00% | -4.32% |
Dividends
SON vs. TROW - Dividend Comparison
SON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than TROW's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SON Sonoco Products Company | 4.45% | 4.84% | 4.24% | 3.62% | 3.16% | 3.11% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.05% | 2.90% | 2.77% | 3.35% |
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 4.78% | 4.96% | 4.39% | 4.53% | 4.40% | 3.72% | 2.38% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 2.17% | 2.87% | 5.71% |
Financials
SON vs. TROW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonoco Products Company and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SON vs. TROW - Profitability Comparison
SON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 345.63M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
TROW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 127.09M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
TROW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.
SON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 67.60M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
TROW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a net income of 562.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SON and TROW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SON has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to TROW (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SON dropped -65.36% vs TROW's -67.43%.
TROW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SON and TROW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer