SON vs. SLGN
SON (Sonoco Products Company) and SLGN (Silgan Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaging & Containers industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, SON returned 4.29%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for SLGN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SON vs. SLGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SON achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than SLGN's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SON has underperformed SLGN with an annualized return of 4.29%, while SLGN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.01% annualized return.
SON
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 20.20%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
SLGN
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- -21.21%
- 3Y*
- -0.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
SON vs. SLGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SON Sonoco Products Company | 18.71% | -6.30% | -9.12% | -4.69% | 8.30% | 0.53% | -0.73% | 19.53% | 3.06% | 3.92% |
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc. | 5.77% | -21.11% | 16.80% | -11.33% | 22.68% | 17.06% | 21.06% | 33.55% | -18.44% | 16.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SON and SLGN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 1997 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, SON and SLGN have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SON:
$5.06B
SLGN:
$4.47B
SON:
$10.39
SLGN:
$2.66
SON:
4.89
SLGN:
15.87
SON:
0.68
SLGN:
0.68
SON:
$7.49B
SLGN:
$6.58B
SON:
$1.57B
SLGN:
$1.14B
SON:
$1.40B
SLGN:
$842.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SON vs. SLGN — Risk / Return Rank
SON
SLGN
SON vs. SLGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SON | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | -0.61 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | -0.87 | +3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SON vs. SLGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SON drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, smaller than the maximum SLGN drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SON and SLGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SON | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.36% | -86.14% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.40% | -34.87% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.46% | -35.03% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.94% | -35.03% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.57% | -35.03% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -24.26% | +12.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -16.64% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 24.52% | -15.11% |
Volatility
SON vs. SLGN - Volatility Comparison
Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) have volatilities of 7.75% and 7.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SON | SLGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 7.55% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.21% | 20.97% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.33% | 32.55% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 25.75% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 23.87% | +1.85% |
Dividends
SON vs. SLGN - Dividend Comparison
SON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than SLGN's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc. | 1.94% | 1.98% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.23% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.19% |
SON Sonoco Products Company | 4.19% | 4.84% | 4.24% | 3.62% | 3.16% | 3.11% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.05% | 2.90% | 2.77% | 3.35% |
Financials
SON vs. SLGN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonoco Products Company and Silgan Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SON vs. SLGN - Profitability Comparison
SON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 345.63M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
SLGN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.80M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.
SON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 127.09M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
SLGN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 134.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.
SON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 67.60M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
SLGN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silgan Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 63.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SON and SLGN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SON has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to SLGN (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SON dropped -65.36% vs SLGN's -86.14%.
SON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SON and SLGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer