SON vs. RGP
SON (Sonoco Products Company) and RGP (Resources Connection, Inc.) are both stocks. SON operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while RGP operates in Consulting Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SON returned 4.57%/yr vs -7.65%/yr for RGP. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SON vs. RGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SON achieves a 31.73% return, which is significantly higher than RGP's -10.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SON has outperformed RGP with an annualized return of 4.57%, while RGP has yielded a comparatively lower -7.65% annualized return.
SON
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- YTD
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.99%
RGP
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -10.29%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- -31.51%
- 5Y*
- -18.70%
- 10Y*
- -7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.18M | $2.64M | $2.32M | |
| $79.88M | $69.77M | $66.57M |
SON vs. RGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SON Sonoco Products Company | 31.73% | -6.30% | -9.12% | -4.69% | 8.30% | 0.53% | -0.73% | 19.53% | 3.06% | 3.92% |
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | -10.29% | -37.28% | -36.50% | -20.09% | 6.25% | 47.30% | -19.45% | 18.95% | -5.11% | -17.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SON and RGP is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2006 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SON and RGP has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SON:
$5.57B
RGP:
$150.52M
SON:
$6.49
RGP:
-$1.21
SON:
0.75
RGP:
0.32
SON:
1.56
RGP:
0.88
SON:
$7.46B
RGP:
$452.01M
SON:
$1.55B
RGP:
$169.68M
SON:
$1.29B
RGP:
-$31.49M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SON vs. RGP — Risk / Return Rank
SON
RGP
SON vs. RGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SON | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | -0.23 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | -0.44 | +3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SON vs. RGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SON drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, smaller than the maximum RGP drawdown of -83.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SON and RGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SON | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.36% | -83.07% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.40% | -34.51% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.46% | -75.33% | +42.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.94% | -81.12% | +48.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.57% | -81.12% | +39.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -78.30% | +71.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.73% | -47.09% | +28.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.12% | 18.27% | -9.15% |
Volatility
SON vs. RGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sonoco Products Company (SON) is 11.23%, while Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a volatility of 23.96%. This indicates that SON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SON | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 23.96% | -12.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.07% | 37.02% | -7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.58% | 49.17% | -16.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.19% | 39.90% | -13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 38.48% | -12.54% |
Dividends
SON vs. RGP - Dividend Comparison
SON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than RGP's 6.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | 6.41% | 6.94% | 6.57% | 3.95% | 3.05% | 3.14% | 4.46% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.18% | 2.20% |
SON Sonoco Products Company | 3.78% | 4.84% | 4.24% | 3.62% | 3.16% | 3.11% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.05% | 2.90% | 2.77% | 3.35% |
Financials
SON vs. RGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonoco Products Company and Resources Connection, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SON vs. RGP - Profitability Comparison
SON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 392.38M and revenue of 1.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.
RGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.00M and revenue of 106.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.6%.
SON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 175.84M and revenue of 1.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
RGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -20.46M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.3%.
SON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 104.89M and revenue of 1.89B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
RGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -16.07M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SON and RGP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGP has higher volatility (23.96%) compared to SON (11.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SON dropped -65.36% vs RGP's -83.07%.
SON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SON and RGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer