PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SON vs. CVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SON vs. CVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SON having a 17.94% return and CVX slightly lower at 17.05%. Over the past 10 years, SON has underperformed CVX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while CVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


SON

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.21%
YTD
17.94%
6M
19.23%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
-0.11%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
4.22%

CVX

1D
0.82%
1M
-8.55%
YTD
17.05%
6M
19.09%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SON vs. CVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SON
Sonoco Products Company
17.94%-6.30%-9.12%-4.69%8.30%0.53%-0.73%19.53%3.06%3.92%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
17.05%10.10%1.29%-13.63%58.46%46.24%-25.95%15.27%-9.75%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SON and CVX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2001

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between SON and CVX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SON:

$5.03B

CVX:

$347.65B

EPS

SON:

$10.39

CVX:

$5.75

PE Ratio

SON:

4.86

CVX:

30.42

PEG Ratio

SON:

0.09

CVX:

2.96

PS Ratio

SON:

0.67

CVX:

1.80

PB Ratio

SON:

1.40

CVX:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

SON:

$7.49B

CVX:

$185.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SON:

$1.57B

CVX:

$47.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

SON:

$1.40B

CVX:

$40.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SON vs. CVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SON
SON Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SON Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SON Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SON Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CVX
CVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SON vs. CVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sonoco Products Company (SON) and Chevron Corporation (CVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SONCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.30

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

3.64

-1.23

SON vs. CVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SON Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the CVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SON and CVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SON vs. CVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SON drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than CVX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SON and CVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SONCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-55.77%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-17.02%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.46%

-20.64%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.94%

-24.95%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.57%

-55.77%

+14.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-16.33%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-11.39%

-7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

6.08%

+3.31%

Volatility

SON vs. CVX - Volatility Comparison

Sonoco Products Company (SON) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Chevron Corporation (CVX) at 7.19%. This indicates that SON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SONCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

7.19%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

18.28%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.39%

22.51%

+8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.73%

25.12%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.75%

29.20%

-3.45%

Dividends

SON vs. CVX - Dividend Comparison

SON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than CVX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVX
Chevron Corporation
3.99%4.49%4.50%4.05%3.16%4.52%6.11%3.95%4.12%3.45%3.64%4.76%
SON
Sonoco Products Company
4.22%4.84%4.24%3.62%3.16%3.11%2.90%2.75%3.05%2.90%2.77%3.35%

Financials

SON vs. CVX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sonoco Products Company and Chevron Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
1.68B
47.56B
(SON) Total Revenue
(CVX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SON vs. CVX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sonoco Products Company and Chevron Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
20.6%
9.6%
Portfolio components
SON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 345.63M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

CVX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.55B and revenue of 47.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

SON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 127.09M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

CVX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

SON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 67.60M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

CVX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chevron Corporation reported a net income of 2.21B and revenue of 47.56B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SON and CVX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SON has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to CVX (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SON dropped -65.36% vs CVX's -55.77%.

CVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SON and CVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer