TROW vs. GLW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) and Corning Incorporated (GLW).

Performance

TROW vs. GLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TROW vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.	-10.91%	-4.67%	9.68%	3.35%	-42.24%	34.91%	28.11%	35.61%	-9.75%	43.38%
GLW Corning Incorporated	62.91%	87.76%	60.64%	-1.23%	-11.56%	5.92%	27.57%	-1.02%	-3.28%	34.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TROW : $19.63B GLW : $122.45B
EPS TROW : $9.91 GLW : $1.85
PE Ratio TROW : 9.07 GLW : 76.90
PS Ratio TROW : 2.70 GLW : 7.85
PB Ratio TROW : 1.81 GLW : 10.37
Total Revenue (TTM) TROW : $7.31B GLW : $15.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) TROW : $3.70B GLW : $5.62B
EBITDA (TTM) TROW : $2.67B GLW : $3.28B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TROW achieves a -10.91% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 62.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TROW has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 5.79%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.

TROW

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -10.91%
• 6M: -8.65%
• 1Y: 2.66%
• 3Y*: -2.76%
• 5Y*: -8.29%
• 10Y*: 5.79%

GLW

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -9.81%
• YTD: 62.91%
• 6M: 72.20%
• 1Y: 217.36%
• 3Y*: 63.34%
• 5Y*: 29.89%
• 10Y*: 24.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TROW vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TROW

TROW Risk / Return Rank: 42
TROW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TROW Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TROW Omega Ratio Rank: 37
TROW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TROW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

GLW

GLW Risk / Return Rank: 98
GLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
GLW Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GLW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TROW vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TROW	GLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	4.60	-4.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	4.37	-4.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.66	-0.61
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	9.38	-9.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	32.09	-31.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TROW vs. GLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TROW Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the GLW Sharpe Ratio of 4.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TROW and GLW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TROW	GLW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	4.60	-4.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	0.93	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.76	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.25	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between TROW and GLW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TROW vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison

TROW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than GLW's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.	5.69%	4.96%	4.39%	4.53%	4.40%	3.72%	2.38%	2.50%	3.03%	2.17%	2.87%	5.71%
GLW Corning Incorporated	0.79%	1.28%	2.36%	3.68%	3.38%	2.58%	2.44%	2.75%	2.38%	1.94%	2.22%	2.63%

Drawdowns

TROW vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TROW drawdown since its inception was -67.43%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TROW and GLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TROW	GLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.43%	-99.02%	+31.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.76%	-23.01%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.16%	-38.11%	-20.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.16%	-48.80%	-9.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.63%	-11.09%	-39.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-50.70%	+34.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.76%	6.72%	+1.04%

Volatility

TROW vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is 5.33%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 23.11%. This indicates that TROW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TROW	GLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	23.11%	-17.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.17%	40.28%	-22.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.70%	47.55%	-17.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.49%	32.38%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.99%	32.15%	-2.16%

Financials

TROW vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and Corning Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TROW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

TROW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 471.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

GLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 672.00M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

TROW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a net income of 547.10M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 28.3%.

GLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 540.00M and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.