PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFR vs. BATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SOFR vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SOFR vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
0.87%4.27%1.20%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
7.90%59.70%-3.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 7.90% return.


SOFR

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.90%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BATT

1D
4.20%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
7.90%
6M
16.74%
1Y
81.61%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SOFR vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SOFR vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFR
SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BATT
BATT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFR vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOFRBATTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.07

2.54

+2.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.43

2.97

+4.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.76

1.41

+2.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.09

4.31

+5.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

42.82

16.05

+26.77

SOFR vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOFR Sharpe Ratio is 5.07, which is higher than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOFR and BATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOFRBATTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07

2.54

+2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.99

-0.05

+5.05

Correlation

The correlation between SOFR and BATT is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SOFR vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than BATT's 1.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SOFR
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF
4.07%4.22%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
1.72%1.85%3.17%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.21%3.22%0.89%

Drawdowns

SOFR vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and BATT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFRBATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-69.38%

+68.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.41%

-18.00%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-16.31%

+16.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-35.41%

+35.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

4.83%

-4.73%

Volatility

SOFR vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) is 0.08%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that SOFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SOFRBATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

14.03%

-13.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.76%

25.15%

-24.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81%

32.37%

-31.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.85%

29.25%

-28.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.85%

30.55%

-29.70%