SOEZ vs. ETCG
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while ETCG is passively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.
Performance
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -38.34% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -47.46% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -24.32%
- YTD
- -38.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -66.78%
- 3Y*
- -20.02%
- 5Y*
- -37.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $62.63K | $57.03K | $104.25K | |
| $83.53K | $76.74K | $179.41K |
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -38.34% | -11.69% |
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -47.46% | -12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and ETCG is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETCG
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOEZ | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and ETCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.14% | -96.59% | +40.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.18% | -96.20% | +48.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -82.89% | +47.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 51.47% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.99% | 57.25% | +10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.99% | 90.69% | -22.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.99% | 114.27% | -46.28% |
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and ETCG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 2.50% for ETCG.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and ETCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer