SOEZ vs. EZET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

SOEZ vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SOEZ having a -43.08% return and EZET slightly lower at -44.18%.

SOEZ

• 1D: -5.25%
• 1M: -18.15%
• YTD: -43.08%
• 6M: -43.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZET

• 1D: -4.27%
• 1M: -19.67%
• YTD: -44.18%
• 6M: -44.13%
• 1Y: -28.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOEZ vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-43.08%	-11.69%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-44.18%	-0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SOEZ and EZET is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

SOEZ vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 6
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOEZ vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOEZ	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.98	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.71	—

Drawdowns

SOEZ vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOEZ	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.14%	-67.56%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-67.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.17%	-65.79%	+13.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.60%	-33.64%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SOEZ	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.83%	69.14%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.83%	72.49%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.83%	72.49%	-1.66%

SOEZ vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOEZ and EZET have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SOEZ vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOEZ and EZET in my portfolio?

SOEZ and EZET have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SOEZ or EZET?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOEZ or EZET?

SOEZ and EZET have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOEZ or EZET?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between SOEZ and EZET?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Franklin Templeton.