SOCL vs. XYLD
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 8.40%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for XYLD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
SOCL vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.97% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 7.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SOCL having a 8.40% annualized return and XYLD not far behind at 8.17%.
SOCL
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -20.41%
- YTD
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -12.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
SOCL vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.97% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 7.16% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and XYLD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SOCL and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
XYLD
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
XYLD
Technology
SOCL
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
XYLD
Industrials
SOCL
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
XYLD
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
XYLD
Energy
SOCL
-
XYLD
Financial Services
SOCL
-
XYLD
Healthcare
SOCL
-
XYLD
Real Estate
SOCL
-
XYLD
Utilities
SOCL
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
XYLD
SOCL vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.57 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.28 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 17.10 | -17.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -33.46% | -35.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -5.29% | -28.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -15.53% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.10% | -18.66% | -46.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -33.46% | -35.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.63% | 0.00% | -39.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.09% | -3.69% | -18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.09% | 1.01% | +17.08% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.81%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 1.81% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 5.91% | +13.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 6.94% | +17.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 11.28% | +18.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 14.15% | +13.47% |
SOCL vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than XYLD's 10.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.28% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and XYLD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to XYLD (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOCL leads with 8.40% vs 8.17% for XYLD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOCL has performed better with a 8.40% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.28%, compared with 0.47% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer