SOCL vs. QUS
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for QUS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SOCL vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 7.96%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
SOCL vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 5.85% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -3.66% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and QUS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SOCL and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
QUS
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
QUS
Technology
SOCL
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
QUS
Industrials
SOCL
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
QUS
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
QUS
Energy
SOCL
-
QUS
Financial Services
SOCL
-
QUS
Healthcare
SOCL
-
QUS
Real Estate
SOCL
-
QUS
Utilities
SOCL
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
QUS
SOCL vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.31 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.29 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 10.09 | -11.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -33.78% | -34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -6.85% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -13.94% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -22.30% | -44.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -33.78% | -34.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -1.80% | -43.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -3.69% | -18.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 1.55% | +15.40% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.71%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 2.71% | +7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 6.96% | +12.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 9.20% | +14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 14.34% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 16.43% | +11.17% |
SOCL vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and QUS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to QUS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.70% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer