SOCL vs. OUSA
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.94%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
SOCL vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.30% return, which is significantly lower than OUSA's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed OUSA with an annualized return of 7.94%, while OUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -13.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- -6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $872.37K | $1.31M | $1.44M | |
| $257.44K | $226.25K | $381.77K |
SOCL vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.30% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 7.09% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and OUSA is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SOCL and OUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
OUSA
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
OUSA
Technology
SOCL
OUSA
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
OUSA
Industrials
SOCL
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
OUSA
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
OUSA
-
Energy
SOCL
-
OUSA
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
OUSA
Healthcare
SOCL
-
OUSA
Real Estate
SOCL
-
OUSA
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
OUSA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
OUSA
SOCL vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.28 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.95 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 6.80 | -7.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -33.12% | -35.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -8.36% | -25.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -13.14% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.06% | -19.54% | -44.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -33.12% | -35.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.14% | -0.23% | -38.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.16% | -3.50% | -18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.14% | 2.39% | +16.75% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 3.65% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | 8.12% | +11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.00% | 10.25% | +14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 13.38% | +16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 15.19% | +12.49% |
SOCL vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and OUSA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 10-year performance, OUSA leads with 10.40% vs 7.94% for SOCL. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.46% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer