SOCL vs. MFUS
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -7.35%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for MFUS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
SOCL vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.97% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.58% return.
SOCL
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -20.41%
- YTD
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -12.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
MFUS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SOCL vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.97% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 8.45% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.58% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and MFUS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SOCL and MFUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
MFUS
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
MFUS
Technology
SOCL
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
MFUS
Industrials
SOCL
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
MFUS
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
MFUS
Energy
SOCL
-
MFUS
Financial Services
SOCL
-
MFUS
Healthcare
SOCL
-
MFUS
Real Estate
SOCL
-
MFUS
Utilities
SOCL
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
MFUS
SOCL vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.38 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.73 | -4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 14.89 | -15.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -35.21% | -33.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -6.39% | -27.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -15.39% | -18.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.10% | -18.22% | -46.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.63% | -2.17% | -37.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.09% | -3.96% | -18.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.09% | 1.60% | +16.49% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.38%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 3.38% | +4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 9.05% | +10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 11.32% | +13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 15.07% | +14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 17.31% | +10.31% |
SOCL vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MFUS's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and MFUS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to MFUS (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.18% vs -7.35% for SOCL. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.18% return vs -7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.47% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer