SOCL vs. IXP
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while IXP tracks the S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for IXP. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IXP.
Performance
SOCL vs. IXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than IXP's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed IXP with an annualized return of 7.96%, while IXP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
IXP
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- 7.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
SOCL vs. IXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | -5.93% | 29.27% | 31.33% | 38.80% | -33.40% | 12.77% | 22.16% | 25.23% | -13.67% | 6.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and IXP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SOCL and IXP shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. IXP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
IXP
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
IXP
Technology
SOCL
IXP
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
IXP
-
Industrials
SOCL
IXP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
IXP
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
IXP
-
Energy
SOCL
-
IXP
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
IXP
-
Healthcare
SOCL
-
IXP
-
Real Estate
SOCL
-
IXP
Utilities
SOCL
-
IXP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. IXP — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
IXP
SOCL vs. IXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.10 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.61 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 1.94 | -3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. IXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than IXP's maximum drawdown of -50.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and IXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -50.11% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -12.26% | -21.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -17.54% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -44.30% | -22.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -44.30% | -24.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -9.86% | -34.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -11.90% | -10.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 3.86% | +13.09% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. IXP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) at 4.80%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | IXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 4.80% | +4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 11.21% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 15.00% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 19.09% | +10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 18.50% | +9.10% |
SOCL vs. IXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IXP's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. IXP - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than IXP's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 3.47% | 2.98% | 1.35% | 1.24% | 0.62% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.18% | 4.32% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.89% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and IXP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to IXP (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs IXP's -50.11%.
On 10-year performance, IXP leads with 8.85% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, IXP is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IXP has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXP has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXP is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
IXP has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while IXP tracks S&P Global 1200 Communication Services 4.5/22.5/45 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.43% for IXP.
IXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and IXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer