SOCL vs. IUSG
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 17.74%/yr for IUSG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
SOCL vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 7.96%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.74%
SOCL vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 8.94% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and IUSG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SOCL and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
IUSG
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
IUSG
Technology
SOCL
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
IUSG
Industrials
SOCL
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
IUSG
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
IUSG
Energy
SOCL
-
IUSG
Financial Services
SOCL
-
IUSG
Healthcare
SOCL
-
IUSG
Real Estate
SOCL
-
IUSG
Utilities
SOCL
-
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
IUSG
SOCL vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.91 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 7.76 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than IUSG's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -63.41% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -13.07% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -22.28% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -32.21% | -34.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -32.35% | -36.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -5.45% | -39.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -21.40% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 3.22% | +13.73% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 7.16%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 7.16% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 13.61% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 16.89% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 21.06% | +8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 20.48% | +7.12% |
SOCL vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than IUSG's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and IUSG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to IUSG (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.74% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.51% for IUSG.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer