SOCL vs. HLAL
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -6.44%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
SOCL vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- -14.38%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SOCL vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -14.38% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 3.74% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and HLAL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SOCL and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
HLAL
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
HLAL
Technology
SOCL
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
HLAL
Industrials
SOCL
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
HLAL
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
HLAL
Energy
SOCL
-
HLAL
Financial Services
SOCL
-
HLAL
Healthcare
SOCL
-
HLAL
Real Estate
SOCL
-
HLAL
Utilities
SOCL
-
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
HLAL
SOCL vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOCL | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.59 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 4.30 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 19.85 | -19.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOCL | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 3.33 | -3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.91 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.89 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -33.57% | -35.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -10.20% | -23.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -21.67% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -23.18% | -43.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.48% | -0.07% | -38.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -5.00% | -16.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.68% | 2.20% | +13.48% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 3.70%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 3.70% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.76% | 9.95% | +7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.24% | 13.17% | +10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 17.60% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 20.21% | +7.34% |
SOCL vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and HLAL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to HLAL (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs -6.44% for SOCL. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs -6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer