SOCL vs. ESPO
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -9.67%/yr vs 5.23%/yr for ESPO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
SOCL vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than ESPO's -16.83% return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -16.83%
- 6M
- -17.45%
- 1Y
- -18.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- —
SOCL vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -9.32% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -16.83% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ESPO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SOCL and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ESPO
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ESPO
Technology
SOCL
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ESPO
-
Industrials
SOCL
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ESPO
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Energy
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ESPO
SOCL vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.84 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.66 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.14 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -50.99% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -28.67% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -28.67% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -48.33% | -17.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -28.67% | -16.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -15.11% | -6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 16.59% | +0.36% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.25%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 4.25% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 14.64% | +4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 18.63% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 25.08% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 25.67% | +1.93% |
SOCL vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ESPO's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.50% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ESPO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to ESPO (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 5.23% vs -9.67% for SOCL. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 5.23% return vs -9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ESPO is Gaming. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.55% for ESPO.
SOCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer