SOCL vs. BOTZ
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -7.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.97% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's -0.92% return.
SOCL
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- -20.41%
- YTD
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -12.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.97% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -0.92% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and BOTZ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SOCL and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
BOTZ
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
BOTZ
Technology
SOCL
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
BOTZ
Industrials
SOCL
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
BOTZ
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
BOTZ
Energy
SOCL
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
SOCL
-
BOTZ
Healthcare
SOCL
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
SOCL
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
SOCL
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
BOTZ
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.10 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.61 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 1.77 | -2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -55.54% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -19.34% | -14.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -29.02% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.10% | -55.54% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.63% | -13.77% | -25.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.09% | -18.23% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.09% | 6.60% | +11.49% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is 8.31%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that SOCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 9.94% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 21.13% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 26.23% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 27.20% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 25.88% | +1.74% |
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than BOTZ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to SOCL (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.50% vs -7.35% for SOCL. On fees, SOCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.50% return vs -7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.47% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer