SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY
SOBO.TO (South Bow Corp) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. SOBO.TO operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past year, SOBO.TO returned 53.85% vs 49.49% for RYCEY. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SOBO.TO is traded in CAD, while RYCEY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RYCEY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOBO.TO achieves a 43.31% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 14.83% return.
SOBO.TO
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 43.31%
- 6M
- 46.62%
- 1Y
- 53.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYCEY
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 21.49%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 116.30%
- 5Y*
- 66.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp | 43.31% | 19.87% | 23.73% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 14.83% | 113.43% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOBO.TO and RYCEY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | -0.02 |
Fundamentals
SOBO.TO:
CA$11.12B
RYCEY:
$147.86B
SOBO.TO:
$2.03
RYCEY:
£0.99
SOBO.TO:
18.81
RYCEY:
13.26
SOBO.TO:
3.47
RYCEY:
0.03
SOBO.TO:
4.37
RYCEY:
2.77
SOBO.TO:
2.99
RYCEY:
40.55
SOBO.TO:
$1.82B
RYCEY:
£40.04B
SOBO.TO:
$893.03M
RYCEY:
£10.10B
SOBO.TO:
$851.07M
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
SOBO.TO
RYCEY
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOBO.TO | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.24 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 2.43 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 6.60 | +5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOBO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.40%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -98.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOBO.TO and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOBO.TO | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.40% | -98.81% | +72.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.09% | -20.47% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -71.08% | +71.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -81.41% | +76.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 7.52% | -2.92% |
Volatility
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) is 7.30%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 12.03%. This indicates that SOBO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOBO.TO | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 12.03% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 32.82% | -17.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 37.90% | -17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.55% | 43.76% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.55% | 49.48% | -4.93% |
Dividends
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
SOBO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than RYCEY's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp | 5.18% | 7.37% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between South Bow Corp and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SOBO.TO vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
SOBO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a gross profit of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
SOBO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported an operating income of 91.48M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
SOBO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, South Bow Corp reported a net income of 75.74M and revenue of 416.07M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOBO.TO and RYCEY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SOBO.TO and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer