SO vs. VLO
SO (The Southern Company) and VLO (Valero Energy Corporation) are both stocks. SO operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while VLO operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SO returned 10.83%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for VLO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SO vs. VLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SO achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than VLO's 58.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SO has underperformed VLO with an annualized return of 10.83%, while VLO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.
SO
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
VLO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 58.86%
- 6M
- 48.51%
- 1Y
- 104.41%
- 3Y*
- 36.67%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
SO vs. VLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SO The Southern Company | 7.91% | 9.47% | 21.72% | 2.21% | 8.24% | 16.34% | 0.63% | 51.65% | -3.75% | 2.42% |
VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 58.86% | 36.97% | -2.96% | 5.86% | 74.95% | 40.25% | -35.69% | 30.27% | -15.73% | 38.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SO and VLO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1982 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SO and VLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SO:
$104.45B
VLO:
$76.23B
SO:
$3.92
VLO:
$13.77
SO:
23.62
VLO:
18.58
SO:
1.46
VLO:
0.07
SO:
3.42
VLO:
0.62
SO:
2.81
VLO:
2.83
SO:
$30.17B
VLO:
$126.17B
SO:
$13.01B
VLO:
$12.45B
SO:
$14.44B
VLO:
$9.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SO vs. VLO — Risk / Return Rank
SO
VLO
SO vs. VLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Southern Company (SO) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SO | VLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.46 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 7.57 | -7.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 18.85 | -17.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SO | VLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 3.08 | -2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.80 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.28 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
SO vs. VLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SO drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum VLO drawdown of -87.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SO and VLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SO | VLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -87.50% | +49.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -14.19% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.99% | -41.22% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.28% | -41.22% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.43% | -71.88% | +33.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -2.15% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -34.27% | +27.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 5.69% | +0.66% |
Volatility
SO vs. VLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Southern Company (SO) is 5.62%, while Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) has a volatility of 9.98%. This indicates that SO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SO | VLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 9.98% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 27.33% | -14.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 34.83% | -18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 36.91% | -18.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 40.39% | -18.45% |
Dividends
SO vs. VLO - Dividend Comparison
SO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than VLO's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SO The Southern Company | 3.22% | 3.37% | 3.47% | 3.96% | 3.78% | 3.82% | 4.13% | 3.86% | 5.42% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 4.60% |
VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 1.82% | 2.78% | 3.49% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 5.22% | 6.93% | 3.84% | 4.27% | 2.34% | 3.51% | 2.40% |
Financials
SO vs. VLO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Southern Company and Valero Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SO vs. VLO - Profitability Comparison
SO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.
VLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.20B and revenue of 32.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.
SO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
VLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.73B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
SO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
VLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 32.38B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SO and VLO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLO has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to SO (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SO dropped -38.43% vs VLO's -87.50%.
VLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SO and VLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer