PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SO vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SO vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Southern Company (SO) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SO achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SO has outperformed DUK with an annualized return of 10.39%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.


SO

1D
0.21%
1M
-3.20%
6M
7.92%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
10.39%
ALL TIME*
12.51%

DUK

1D
-0.67%
1M
-3.22%
6M
5.14%
YTD
8.86%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
8.22%
ALL TIME*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$477.93M$469.09M$452.15M
$485.34M$447.77M$549.03M

SO vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SO
The Southern Company
10.53%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
8.86%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SO and DUK is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 1983

0.62

Over the past year, SO and DUK have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SO:

$106.57B

DUK:

$97.78B

EPS

SO:

$4.15

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

SO:

22.78

DUK:

18.99

PEG Ratio

SO:

1.41

DUK:

1.49

PS Ratio

SO:

3.51

DUK:

2.93

PB Ratio

SO:

2.55

DUK:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

SO:

$30.18B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SO:

$13.10B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

SO:

$14.19B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SO vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SO vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Southern Company (SO) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SODUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.57

1.39

-0.83

SO vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SO Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SO and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SO vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SO drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SO and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SODUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-71.92%

+33.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-10.88%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.99%

-11.59%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

-24.16%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.43%

-37.37%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-5.20%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-10.83%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.48%

4.84%

+1.64%

Volatility

SO vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Southern Company (SO) is 6.01%, while Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that SO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SODUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

6.63%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

12.49%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

15.65%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

17.96%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

20.46%

+1.55%

Dividends

SO vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

SO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than DUK's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.40%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
SO
The Southern Company
3.48%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%

Financials

SO vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Southern Company and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SO vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Southern Company and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.58B and revenue of 6.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 6.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.17B and revenue of 6.98B, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SO and DUK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUK has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to SO (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SO dropped -38.43% vs DUK's -71.92%.

DUK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SO and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer