PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SO vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SO vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Southern Company (SO) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SO

1D
1.07%
1M
1.71%
YTD
7.91%
6M
9.06%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
10.83%

K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SO vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SO
The Southern Company
7.91%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SO and K is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984

0.31

The correlation between SO and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SO:

$104.45B

K:

$29.20B

EPS

SO:

$3.92

K:

$3.65

PE Ratio

SO:

23.62

K:

22.87

PEG Ratio

SO:

1.46

K:

3.84

PS Ratio

SO:

3.42

K:

2.30

PB Ratio

SO:

2.81

K:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

SO:

$30.17B

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SO:

$13.01B

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SO:

$14.44B

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SO vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

K
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SO vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Southern Company (SO) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

SO vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

Drawdowns

SO vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.35%

Volatility

SO vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

Dividends

SO vs. K - Dividend Comparison

SO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than K's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
SO
The Southern Company
3.22%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%

Financials

SO vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Southern Company and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
3.26B
(SO) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SO vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Southern Company and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
46.5%
33.3%
Portfolio components
SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SO and K have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SO and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer