PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNXFX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 21.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has outperformed GTLOX with an annualized return of 14.79%, while GTLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.23% annualized return.


SNXFX

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.06%
6M
8.15%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
14.79%
ALL TIME*
10.60%

GTLOX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.51%
6M
15.82%
YTD
21.11%
1Y
38.54%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
10.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
10.31%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
21.11%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and GTLOX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.95

The correlation between SNXFX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNXFXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

4.97

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

20.11

-10.87

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNXFXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-54.09%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.47%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-32.85%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-32.85%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-38.15%

+3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.42%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-8.28%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.86%

+0.23%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) at 3.22%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNXFXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.22%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

11.66%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

14.87%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

21.97%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

20.92%

-2.18%

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNXFX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GTLOX's 14.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.72%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.32%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNXFX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNXFX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GTLOX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer