SNSR vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNSR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SNSR returned 49.79% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

SNSR vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

SNSR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 19.62%
• YTD: 44.93%
• 6M: 43.21%
• 1Y: 49.79%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	44.93%	6.46%	-0.45%	-0.15%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and CHPS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.83

The correlation between SNSR and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNSR	CHPS
Technology	78.7%	98.8%
Industrials	15.7%	0.4%
Healthcare	4.8%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.2%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SNSR vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNSR	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	6.54	-4.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	6.07	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.81	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	12.87	-9.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	49.99	-39.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNSR vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNSR	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	6.54	-4.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.81	-1.21

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNSR	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-39.44%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-17.50%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-9.16%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	4.50%	+0.10%

Volatility

SNSR vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is 9.35%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that SNSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNSR	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	14.18%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.55%	28.19%	-9.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	34.43%	-10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.16%	33.78%	-8.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	33.78%	-9.11%

SNSR vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNSR vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.37%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNSR and CHPS in my portfolio?

SNSR and CHPS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNSR or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SNSR (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, SNSR or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 49.79% for SNSR. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNSR has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNSR or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 49.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNSR or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNSR or CHPS?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between SNSR and CHPS?

SNSR is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.