PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSR vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SNSR vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SNSR vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
1.79%6.46%-0.45%-0.15%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
15.56%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 15.56% return.


SNSR

1D
0.92%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
1.79%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*

CHPS

1D
2.99%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
15.56%
6M
33.65%
1Y
100.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SNSR vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SNSR vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR
SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNSRCHPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

2.68

-2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

3.21

-2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

5.78

-4.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.85

20.15

-17.30

SNSR vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and CHPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNSRCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.68

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.02

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and CHPS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SNSR vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than CHPS's 0.58% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
0.53%0.54%0.73%0.74%0.82%0.43%0.21%1.12%1.25%1.11%0.31%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.58%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and CHPS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSRCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-39.44%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-17.50%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-10.07%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-9.63%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

5.02%

+0.18%

Volatility

SNSR vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is 8.61%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that SNSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SNSRCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

13.34%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

26.34%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.15%

37.76%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

32.82%

-8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

32.82%

-8.28%