SNPS vs. AMBA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA).

Performance

SNPS vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SNPS vs. AMBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNPS Synopsys, Inc.	-15.59%	-3.22%	-5.74%	61.27%	-13.35%	42.15%	86.24%	65.24%	-1.17%	44.82%
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	-27.34%	-2.61%	18.68%	-25.47%	-59.47%	120.96%	51.62%	73.13%	-40.46%	8.54%

Fundamentals

EPS SNPS : $9.19 AMBA : -$1.78
PS Ratio SNPS : 5.93 AMBA : 5.61
Total Revenue (TTM) SNPS : $8.01B AMBA : $390.70M
Gross Profit (TTM) SNPS : $6.02B AMBA : $231.27M
EBITDA (TTM) SNPS : $2.35B AMBA : -$71.46M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPS achieves a -15.59% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's -27.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SNPS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 23.18%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.

SNPS

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -4.23%
• YTD: -15.59%
• 6M: -19.64%
• 1Y: -7.55%
• 3Y*: 0.88%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: 23.18%

AMBA

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: -14.69%
• YTD: -27.34%
• 6M: -37.62%
• 1Y: 2.27%
• 3Y*: -12.72%
• 5Y*: -13.33%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SNPS vs. AMBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPS

SNPS Risk / Return Rank: 36
SNPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SNPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SNPS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SNPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SNPS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AMBA

AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPS vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNPS	AMBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	0.03	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	0.54	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.08	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	0.03	-0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	0.08	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNPS vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPS and AMBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNPS	AMBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	0.03	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	-0.22	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.03	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.30	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between SNPS and AMBA is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SNPS vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNPS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SNPS vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPS drawdown since its inception was -60.95%, smaller than the maximum AMBA drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPS and AMBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPS	AMBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.95%	-81.65%	+20.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.04%	-49.06%	+8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.04%	-81.65%	+40.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.04%	-81.65%	+40.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.56%	-76.26%	+37.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-48.11%	+27.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.28%	20.25%	+3.03%

Volatility

SNPS vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) is 10.69%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that SNPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPS	AMBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	13.61%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.32%	46.82%	-17.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.46%	67.07%	-9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.19%	61.74%	-21.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.57%	56.05%	-21.48%

Financials

SNPS vs. AMBA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Synopsys, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SNPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.16M and revenue of 100.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

SNPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.05M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.65M and revenue of 100.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.5%.

SNPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Synopsys, Inc. reported a net income of 64.72M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -16.44M and revenue of 100.87M, resulting in a net margin of -16.3%.