PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPD vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPD vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than IVOV's 8.98% return.


SNPD

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.63%
YTD
8.10%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
10Y*

IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPD vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.10%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and IVOV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.86

The correlation between SNPD and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPD vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNPD
IVOV

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
5.5%

Industrials

17.5%
18.8%

Utilities

14.4%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
13.5%

Financial Services

8.5%
21.9%

Basic Materials

7.1%
6.0%

Real Estate

6.8%
9.6%

Technology

6.3%
9.2%

Healthcare

4.9%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.4%
0.5%

Energy

3.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

SNPD
18.7%
IVOV
5.5%

Industrials

SNPD
17.5%
IVOV
18.8%

Utilities

SNPD
14.4%
IVOV
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SNPD
8.7%
IVOV
13.5%

Financial Services

SNPD
8.5%
IVOV
21.9%

Basic Materials

SNPD
7.1%
IVOV
6.0%

Real Estate

SNPD
6.8%
IVOV
9.6%

Technology

SNPD
6.3%
IVOV
9.2%

Healthcare

SNPD
4.9%
IVOV
3.5%

Communication Services

SNPD
3.4%
IVOV
0.5%

Energy

SNPD
3.1%
IVOV
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPD vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPDIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.97

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

6.80

-2.08

SNPD vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPDIVOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.58

0.00

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPDIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-45.99%

+30.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-10.58%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-22.61%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-0.31%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-5.43%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.07%

-0.17%

Volatility

SNPD vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 2.75%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPDIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

4.07%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

10.61%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

15.27%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

19.48%

-6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

21.73%

-8.59%

SNPD vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNPD vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than IVOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.01%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPD and IVOV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 3-year performance, IVOV leads with 13.95% vs 8.75% for SNPD. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.

SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPD and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer