SNPD vs. IVOV
SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - SNPD tracks the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPD returned 8.75%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for IVOV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
SNPD vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than IVOV's 8.98% return.
SNPD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
SNPD vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.10% | 6.66% | 5.41% | 2.68% | 3.49% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPD and IVOV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SNPD and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNPD vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPD
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
SNPD
IVOV
Industrials
SNPD
IVOV
Utilities
SNPD
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
SNPD
IVOV
Financial Services
SNPD
IVOV
Basic Materials
SNPD
IVOV
Real Estate
SNPD
IVOV
Technology
SNPD
IVOV
Healthcare
SNPD
IVOV
Communication Services
SNPD
IVOV
Energy
SNPD
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPD vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
SNPD
IVOV
SNPD vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.97 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 6.80 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SNPD vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -45.99% | +30.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -10.58% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.80% | -22.61% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -0.31% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -5.43% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.07% | -0.17% |
Volatility
SNPD vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 2.75%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPD | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.07% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 10.61% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 15.27% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 19.48% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 21.73% | -8.59% |
SNPD vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNPD vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than IVOV's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.01% | 3.10% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPD and IVOV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to SNPD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPD dropped -15.80% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 3-year performance, IVOV leads with 13.95% vs 8.75% for SNPD. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 13.95% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPD.
SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.
SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPD and 0.10% for IVOV.
IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPD and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer