SNOY vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). SNOY is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 22.36% vs 3083.51% for MUU. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

SNOY vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 642.75% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 11.12%
• 6M: 22.18%
• YTD: 20.69%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -10.27%
• 6M: 421.21%
• YTD: 642.75%
• 1Y: 3,083.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	20.69%	30.66%	21.62%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	642.75%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and MUU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.23

The correlation between SNOY and MUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 18
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	27.27	-26.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	5.80	-4.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.72	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	75.03	-74.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	245.78	-244.89

SNOY vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 27.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-75.07%	+24.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-52.72%	+1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-30.01%	+27.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.49%	-23.40%	+10.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.10%	16.41%	+6.69%

Volatility

SNOY vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) is 8.96%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.23%. This indicates that SNOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.96%	67.23%	-58.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.90%	116.08%	-68.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.87%	145.04%	-87.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.32%	138.03%	-86.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.32%	138.03%	-86.71%

SNOY vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.79%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.64%	4.27%	0.31%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	69.79%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and MUU in my portfolio?

SNOY and MUU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.23%) compared to SNOY (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3083.51% vs 22.36% for SNOY. On fees, SNOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SNOY has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3083.51% return vs 22.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or MUU?

SNOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or MUU?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 69.79%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

What is the main difference between SNOY and MUU?

SNOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (27.27 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.