SNOY vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both funds - SNOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past year, SNOY returned 11.26% vs 12.90% for CRF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.

Performance

SNOY vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.31% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 47.92%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 11.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: 12.90%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	8.61%	30.66%	21.28%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.31%	12.46%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and CRF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024	0.31

The correlation between SNOY and CRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 14
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	0.75	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.14	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	0.78	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	2.59	-2.14

SNOY vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-80.70%	+29.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-14.88%	-36.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.86%	-5.09%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-22.31%	+9.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.02%	4.48%	+18.54%

Volatility

SNOY vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 33.96% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 4.16%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.96%	4.16%	+29.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.65%	13.41%	+34.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.45%	15.41%	+42.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.88%	25.07%	+26.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.88%	25.86%	+26.02%

SNOY vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, more than CRF's 19.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.63%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	70.30%	84.96%	33.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and CRF in my portfolio?

SNOY and CRF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or CRF?

SNOY has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to CRF (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.