SNOY vs. COYY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for COYY.

Performance

SNOY vs. COYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than COYY's -29.65% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -5.43%
• 1M: 59.59%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: -4.49%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COYY

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: -7.38%
• YTD: -29.65%
• 6M: -39.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. COYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	9.89%	-2.60%
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	-29.65%	-38.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and COYY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. COYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. COYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNOY	COYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNOY	COYY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	-1.74	+2.36

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. COYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum COYY drawdown of -58.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and COYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	COYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-58.58%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.82%	-58.58%	+47.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.75%	-35.21%	+22.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	COYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.40%	36.39%	+21.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.26%	36.39%	+15.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.26%	36.39%	+15.87%

SNOY vs. COYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than COYY's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. COYY - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.63%, less than COYY's 386.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	386.46%	132.14%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	74.63%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and COYY in my portfolio?

SNOY and COYY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or COYY?

On fees, SNOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or COYY?

SNOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or COYY?

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 386.46%, compared with 74.63% for SNOY.

What is the main difference between SNOY and COYY?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 1.07% for COYY.