SNOY vs. CONY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 12.02% vs -42.39% for CONY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

SNOY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -25.27% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -5.43%
• 1M: 59.59%
• YTD: 9.89%
• 6M: -4.49%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -5.62%
• 1M: -16.66%
• YTD: -25.27%
• 6M: -35.82%
• 1Y: -42.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	9.89%	30.66%	21.03%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-25.27%	-26.34%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and CONY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNOY	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	-0.73	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	-0.91	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.89	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	-0.67	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.52	-1.13	+1.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNOY vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNOY	CONY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	-0.73	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.13	+0.49

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-63.57%	+12.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-63.39%	+12.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.82%	-57.66%	+46.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.75%	-22.17%	+9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.96%	37.68%	-14.72%

Volatility

SNOY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 34.27% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 15.87%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.27%	15.87%	+18.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.74%	43.66%	+5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.40%	58.29%	-0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.26%	60.06%	-7.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.26%	60.06%	-7.80%

SNOY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNOY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

SNOY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.63%, less than CONY's 189.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	189.23%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	74.63%	84.96%	33.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and CONY in my portfolio?

SNOY and CONY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or CONY?

SNOY has higher volatility (34.27%) compared to CONY (15.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs CONY's -63.57%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or CONY?

On 1-year performance, SNOY leads with 12.02% vs -42.39% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or CONY?

Over the 1-year period, SNOY has performed better with a 12.02% return vs -42.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or CONY?

SNOY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 189.23%, compared with 74.63% for SNOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.