SNOY vs. BWET

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. SNOY is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 22.36% vs 1694.79% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

SNOY vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 955.56% return.

SNOY

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 11.12%
• 6M: 22.18%
• YTD: 20.69%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 665.91%
• YTD: 955.56%
• 1Y: 1,694.79%
• 3Y*: 123.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOY vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	20.69%	30.66%	21.28%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	955.56%	96.22%	-42.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SNOY and BWET is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024	-0.06

The correlation between SNOY and BWET shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNOY vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 18
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOY vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNOY	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	16.46	-16.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	6.03	-4.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.88	-0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	41.86	-41.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	158.00	-157.11

SNOY vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOY Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 16.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOY and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNOY vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNOY	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.90%	-56.90%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.90%	-41.22%	-9.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-6.61%	+4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.49%	-23.74%	+11.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.10%	10.90%	+12.20%

Volatility

SNOY vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) is 8.96%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 42.77%. This indicates that SNOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNOY	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.96%	42.77%	-33.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.90%	95.61%	-47.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.87%	104.81%	-46.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.32%	73.55%	-22.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.32%	73.55%	-22.23%

SNOY vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNOY vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.79%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	69.79%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNOY and BWET in my portfolio?

SNOY and BWET have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNOY or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (42.77%) compared to SNOY (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, SNOY or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1694.79% vs 22.36% for SNOY. On fees, SNOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SNOY has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNOY or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1694.79% return vs 22.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNOY or BWET?

SNOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNOY or BWET?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 69.79%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between SNOY and BWET?

SNOY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.46 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.