SNEX vs. EAT
SNEX (StoneX Group Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. SNEX operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SNEX returned 33.48%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for EAT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNEX vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNEX achieves a 118.84% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 14.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SNEX has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 33.48%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 15.08% annualized return.
SNEX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 23.79%
- YTD
- 118.84%
- 6M
- 115.47%
- 1Y
- 145.88%
- 3Y*
- 77.18%
- 5Y*
- 49.24%
- 10Y*
- 33.48%
EAT
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 19.69%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- -7.94%
- 3Y*
- 69.04%
- 5Y*
- 23.75%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
SNEX vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNEX StoneX Group Inc. | 118.84% | 45.65% | 32.70% | 16.21% | 55.59% | 5.79% | 18.57% | 33.49% | -13.99% | 7.40% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 14.59% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNEX and EAT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1996 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SNEX and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SNEX:
$11.31B
EAT:
$7.32B
SNEX:
$7.78
EAT:
$10.14
SNEX:
17.83
EAT:
16.22
SNEX:
0.67
EAT:
0.37
SNEX:
0.05
EAT:
1.31
SNEX:
4.19
EAT:
18.03
SNEX:
$152.34B
EAT:
$5.73B
SNEX:
$47.64B
EAT:
$3.45B
SNEX:
$2.46B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNEX vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
SNEX
EAT
SNEX vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNEX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.01 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.02 | -0.18 | +7.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.98 | -0.36 | +18.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNEX vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNEX drawdown since its inception was -97.89%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNEX and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNEX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.89% | -88.40% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -44.41% | +23.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -45.92% | +25.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -65.54% | +41.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.65% | -84.94% | +36.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -13.05% | +12.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.86% | -24.33% | -18.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | 21.86% | -13.71% |
Volatility
SNEX vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) have volatilities of 12.39% and 12.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNEX | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 12.26% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.98% | 36.42% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.87% | 47.20% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.24% | 49.02% | -13.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.55% | 55.19% | -18.64% |
Dividends
SNEX vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNEX nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
SNEX StoneX Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SNEX vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between StoneX Group Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNEX vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
SNEX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.35B and revenue of 45.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.1%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
SNEX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported an operating income of 45.32B and revenue of 45.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 99.0%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
SNEX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported a net income of 174.30M and revenue of 45.76B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNEX and EAT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNEX has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to EAT (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNEX dropped -97.89% vs EAT's -88.40%.
SNEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNEX and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer