SNAV vs. TOLZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNAV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Mohr Funds, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. SNAV is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 14.33%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for TOLZ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.

Performance

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOLZ

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.64%	15.54%	11.11%	12.29%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	12.09%	14.76%	11.67%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and TOLZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between SNAV and TOLZ has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	TOLZ
Technology	46.0%	0.4%
Financial Services	9.6%	1.9%
Industrials	8.0%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	0.8%
Healthcare	7.9%	-
Communication Services	6.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.4%
Energy	2.7%	36.0%
Utilities	2.6%	22.2%
Real Estate	2.6%	7.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

TOLZ

TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	TOLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.58	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.27	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.27	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.17	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	9.16	+1.69

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and TOLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	TOLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-39.33%	+22.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-5.18%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-11.94%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-2.45%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-6.61%	+4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.79%	+0.11%

Volatility

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	TOLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	3.24%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	8.30%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	10.41%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	13.98%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	16.23%	-2.50%

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	3.63%	3.99%	3.53%	3.34%	3.01%	3.28%	3.16%	2.96%	3.63%	3.30%	2.62%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and TOLZ in my portfolio?

SNAV and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or TOLZ?

SNAV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or TOLZ?

On 3-year performance, TOLZ leads with 15.12% vs 14.33% for SNAV. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or TOLZ?

Over the 3-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or TOLZ?

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or TOLZ?

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and TOLZ?

SNAV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.46% for TOLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.