PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUL vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUL vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 23.62% return.


MFUL

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.18%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.75%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.08%

AVUV

1D
0.03%
1M
1.43%
6M
15.37%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$143.14M$148.43M$155.85M
$6.81K$15.69K$11.16K

MFUL vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
2.75%4.51%5.36%2.24%-12.46%-1.61%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
23.62%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUL and AVUV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.57

The correlation between MFUL and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUL vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFUL vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFULAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

4.74

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

14.98

-9.99

MFUL vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUL and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFUL vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFULAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-49.42%

+33.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-7.95%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-28.79%

+24.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.72%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-7.78%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.52%

-1.59%

Volatility

MFUL vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) is 1.07%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that MFUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFULAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

2.88%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

10.51%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

16.90%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.27%

22.40%

-18.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

28.02%

-23.75%

MFUL vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUL vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than AVUV's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.25%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
2.41%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUL and AVUV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to MFUL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUL dropped -16.41% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 3-year performance, AVUV leads with 16.14% vs 4.38% for MFUL. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.25% for AVUV.

MFUL is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MFUL and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUL and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer