PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNAV having a 11.72% return and ITOT slightly higher at 11.78%.


SNAV

1D
0.13%
1M
6.05%
YTD
11.72%
6M
11.40%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
11.72%15.54%11.11%12.25%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%21.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and ITOT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023

0.93

The correlation between SNAV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNAV
ITOT

Technology

38.4%
33.8%

Financial Services

16.5%
12.1%

Healthcare

14.5%
9.0%

Industrials

6.6%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
10.1%

Communication Services

5.8%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.7%

Energy

2.4%
3.7%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.1%

Technology

SNAV
38.4%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

SNAV
16.5%
ITOT
12.1%

Healthcare

SNAV
14.5%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

SNAV
6.6%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SNAV
6.5%
ITOT
10.1%

Communication Services

SNAV
5.8%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

SNAV
3.4%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

SNAV
2.4%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

SNAV
2.2%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

SNAV
2.1%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

SNAV
1.6%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV
SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNAVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.25

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

14.92

-0.70

SNAV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNAVITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.37

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.57

+0.54

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-55.20%

+38.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-8.90%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.61%

-19.44%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.25%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-6.97%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.94%

-0.15%

Volatility

SNAV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.05% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.94%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

9.14%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

12.19%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

17.35%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

18.26%

-4.63%

SNAV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
SNAV
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.94%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SNAV and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNAV has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 15.73% for SNAV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.03% for ITOT.

SNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer