SNAV vs. FTAG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 14.33%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for FTAG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.

Performance

SNAV vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than FTAG's 6.79% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTAG

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 6.97%
• 1Y: 8.43%
• 3Y*: 3.75%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.64%	15.54%	11.11%	12.29%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	6.79%	14.82%	-6.72%	-11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and FTAG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.56

The correlation between SNAV and FTAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SNAV vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	FTAG
Technology	46.0%	-
Financial Services	9.6%	-
Industrials	8.0%	24.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	4.2%
Healthcare	7.9%	7.7%
Communication Services	6.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	8.5%
Energy	2.7%	-
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	55.6%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FTAG

FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 19
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	FTAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.60	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	0.95	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.11	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	0.89	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	2.04	+8.81

SNAV vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and FTAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	FTAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-90.89%	+74.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-9.56%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-21.87%	+5.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-79.35%	+76.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-71.25%	+68.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	4.15%	-2.25%

Volatility

SNAV vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) at 3.95%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	FTAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	3.95%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	10.93%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	14.17%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	17.41%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	19.60%	-5.87%

SNAV vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	1.42%	1.39%	2.89%	3.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.72%	2.33%	2.16%	1.26%	0.61%	1.35%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and FTAG in my portfolio?

SNAV and FTAG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or FTAG?

SNAV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to FTAG (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or FTAG?

On 3-year performance, SNAV leads with 14.33% vs 3.75% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or FTAG?

Over the 3-year period, SNAV has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or FTAG?

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or FTAG?

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and FTAG?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.70% for FTAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.