SNAV vs. FJUN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 14.33%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

SNAV vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.00% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.64%	15.54%	11.11%	12.29%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.00%	11.05%	16.38%	20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and FJUN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.88

The correlation between SNAV and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	FJUN
Technology	46.0%	39.0%
Financial Services	9.6%	11.1%
Industrials	8.0%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	9.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.3%
Communication Services	6.9%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.5%
Energy	2.7%	3.1%
Utilities	2.6%	2.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 80
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.23	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.38	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.48	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.05	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	17.51	-6.66

SNAV vs. FJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and FJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-13.26%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-4.13%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-13.26%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-0.97%	-2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-1.66%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	0.72%	+1.18%

Volatility

SNAV vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.94%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	0.94%	+3.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	4.40%	+3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	5.66%	+5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	10.56%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	10.25%	+3.48%

SNAV vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAV nor FJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and FJUN in my portfolio?

SNAV and FJUN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or FJUN?

SNAV has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to FJUN (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs FJUN's -13.26%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or FJUN?

On 3-year performance, SNAV leads with 14.33% vs 13.29% for FJUN. On fees, FJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or FJUN?

Over the 3-year period, SNAV has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or FJUN?

FJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or FJUN?

SNAV and FJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SNAV and FJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.85% for FJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.