SMZ vs. QQQP
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while QQQP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. SMZ is passively managed, while QQQP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QQQP.
Performance
SMZ vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- YTD
- 28.90%
- 1Y
- 53.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMZ vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | 4.34% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 30.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and QQQP is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | -0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank
SMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQP
SMZ vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and QQQP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -42.50% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.15% | -5.44% | -53.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.88% | -7.25% | -31.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.22% | — |
Volatility
SMZ vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.85% | 35.40% | +152.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.85% | 44.33% | +143.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.85% | 44.33% | +143.52% |
SMZ vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMZ nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and QQQP have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SMZ and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQP is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.30% for QQQP.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and QQQP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer