SMZ vs. LITX
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while LITX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. SMZ is passively managed, while LITX is actively managed. Their -0.34 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 1.49% expense ratio.
Performance
SMZ vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- 6M
- 78.91%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $72.96M | $66.22M | $208.61M | |
| $795.18K | $775.91K | $1.24M |
SMZ vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -1.46% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | -6.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and LITX is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, roughly equal to the maximum LITX drawdown of -73.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -73.97% | -3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.42% | -63.99% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -25.05% | -15.87% |
Volatility
SMZ vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.99% | 198.72% | -9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 198.72% | -9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.99% | 198.72% | -9.73% |
SMZ vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMZ and LITX have an expense ratio of 1.49%.
Dividends
SMZ vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMZ nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and LITX have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMZ and LITX have the same expense ratio: 1.49% per year.
SMZ and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while LITX is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer