PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMZ vs. ARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMZ vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMZ

1D
22.81%
1M
29.65%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARCX

1D
-26.35%
1M
-28.89%
YTD
-57.42%
6M
-68.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMZ vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMZ and ARCX is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

-0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMZ vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMZ vs. ARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMZARCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

-0.63

+0.44

Drawdowns

SMZ vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum ARCX drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and ARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMZARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.30%

-91.51%

+14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.88%

-90.32%

+27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-64.61%

+32.46%

Volatility

SMZ vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMZARCXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.86%

140.73%

+51.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.86%

140.73%

+51.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.86%

140.73%

+51.13%

SMZ vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMZ vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMZ nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMZ and ARCX have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.

SMZ and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARCX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.30% for ARCX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMZ and ARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer