SMZ vs. ARCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NuScale Power Corporation (SMR), while ARCX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. SMZ is passively managed, while ARCX is actively managed. Their -0.70 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ARCX.

Performance

SMZ vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMZ

• 1D: 4.06%
• 1M: 7.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ARCX

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -18.30%
• 6M: -69.54%
• YTD: -73.15%
• 1Y: -87.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -89.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	$474.65K	$398.88K	$951.49K
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF	$795.18K	$775.91K	$1.24M

SMZ vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF	-1.46%
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-68.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SMZ and ARCX is -0.70, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	-0.70

Return for Risk

SMZ vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMZ vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMZ	ARCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.87	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.25	—

Drawdowns

SMZ vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, smaller than the maximum ARCX drawdown of -94.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and ARCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMZ	ARCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.30%	-94.32%	+17.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-93.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.42%	-93.90%	+32.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.92%	-68.07%	+27.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	70.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMZ	ARCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	53.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	97.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	188.99%	140.02%	+48.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	188.99%	144.59%	+44.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	188.99%	144.59%	+44.40%

SMZ vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMZ vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMZ nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMZ and ARCX in my portfolio?

SMZ and ARCX have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMZ or ARCX?

On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMZ or ARCX?

ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMZ or ARCX?

SMZ and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SMZ and ARCX?

SMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ARCX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.30% for ARCX.