SMZ vs. PLTZ
SMZ (Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SMZ is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMZ
- 1D
- 22.81%
- 1M
- 29.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZ
- 1D
- 8.60%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMZ Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF | -13.39% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | -24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMZ and PLTZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short SMR Daily ETF (SMZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.59 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMZ drawdown since its inception was -77.30%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMZ and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.30% | -70.28% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.88% | -59.38% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.15% | -52.09% | +19.94% |
Volatility
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMZ | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.86% | 101.97% | +89.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.86% | 101.97% | +89.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.86% | 101.97% | +89.89% |
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMZ nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for SMZ.
SMZ and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for SMZ and 1.29% for PLTZ.
Find the right allocation for SMZ and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer