SMYY vs. BAR
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SMYY is a Options Trading fund managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.
Performance
SMYY vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than BAR's 2.94% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAR
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 6.70% | -27.52% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 2.94% | 11.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and BAR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
SMYY
BAR
SMYY vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.98 | 0.90 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and BAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | -21.53% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.74% | -17.72% | -11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | -6.45% | -18.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility
SMYY vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 26.43% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 17.90% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 16.38% | +16.31% |
SMYY vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 146.89% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMYY and BAR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 146.89%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.
SMYY is categorized as Options Trading, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.17% for BAR.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and BAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer