SMTH vs. SMRF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and SMRF (ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS, while SMRF is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMRF.

Performance

SMTH vs. SMRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMTH

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: -0.35%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.92%

SMRF

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	$242.56K	$268.44K	$363.09K
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	$8.66M	$9.56M	$10.10M

SMTH vs. SMRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	-1.54%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and SMRF is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

SMTH vs. SMRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMTH

SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 23
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SMRF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMTH vs. SMRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMTH	SMRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	—	—

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. SMRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum SMRF drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and SMRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMTH	SMRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-26.22%	+22.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-17.77%	+15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-8.67%	+7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMTH	SMRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.60%	46.48%	-42.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.53%	46.48%	-41.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.53%	46.48%	-41.95%

SMTH vs. SMRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMTH vs. SMRF - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SMRF's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	4.43%	4.46%	4.58%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMTH and SMRF in my portfolio?

SMTH and SMRF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMTH or SMRF?

On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMTH or SMRF?

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMTH or SMRF?

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.58% for SMRF.

What is the main difference between SMTH and SMRF?

SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SMRF is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 0.65% for SMRF.