SMTH vs. ALIBX
SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and ALIBX (ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund) are both funds - SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS, while ALIBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by ALPS. Over the past year, SMTH returned 5.19% vs 21.06% for ALIBX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for ALIBX.
Performance
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ALIBX's 7.75% return.
SMTH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.34% | 6.86% | 2.76% | 3.49% |
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 7.75% | 12.89% | 14.89% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMTH and ALIBX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMTH vs. ALIBX — Risk / Return Rank
SMTH
ALIBX
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMTH | ALIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 2.43 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 3.50 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.02 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 13.77 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMTH | ALIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 2.43 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.90 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum ALIBX drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and ALIBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMTH | ALIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -20.38% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.74% | -7.13% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.44% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -4.75% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.56% | -0.65% |
Volatility
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) is 1.31%, while ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that SMTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMTH | ALIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 2.69% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 7.10% | -4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 8.86% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 11.17% | -6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 11.01% | -6.42% |
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ALIBX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMTH vs. ALIBX - Dividend Comparison
SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than ALIBX's 8.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 8.45% | 9.14% | 10.61% | 1.37% | 1.08% | 0.56% | 0.12% |
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.46% | 4.58% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMTH and ALIBX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALIBX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to SMTH (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs ALIBX's -20.38%.
ALIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMTH and ALIBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer