SMTH vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMTH (ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMTH is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by ALPS, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMTH returned 5.19% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMTH charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

SMTH vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTH achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.

SMTH

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 5.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 8.25%
• 1M: 135.69%
• YTD: 395.18%
• 6M: 371.52%
• 1Y: 1,189.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMTH vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	0.34%	6.86%	3.74%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	395.18%	103.00%	-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SMTH and AMDL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.06

SMTH vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMTH	AMDL
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMTH vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTH

SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 38
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMTH vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMTH	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	9.30	-7.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	4.81	-2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.63	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	21.43	-19.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.72	42.08	-36.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMTH vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 9.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTH and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMTH	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	9.30	-7.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.56	+0.63

Drawdowns

SMTH vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTH drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTH and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMTH	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-88.63%	+84.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.74%	-56.13%	+53.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	0.00%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-48.58%	+47.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	28.53%	-27.62%

Volatility

SMTH vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) is 1.31%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that SMTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMTH	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	46.02%	-44.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	94.09%	-91.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	129.41%	-125.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.59%	116.59%	-112.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	116.59%	-112.00%

SMTH vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMTH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMTH vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

SMTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMTH ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF	4.40%	4.46%	4.58%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMTH and AMDL in my portfolio?

SMTH and AMDL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMTH or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to SMTH (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMTH dropped -4.11% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, SMTH or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs 5.19% for SMTH. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SMTH has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMTH or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMTH or AMDL?

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMTH or AMDL?

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between SMTH and AMDL?

SMTH is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SMTH and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.