SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L
SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) and ULVR.L (Unilever PLC) are both stocks. SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while ULVR.L operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L returned 27.10%/yr vs 4.45%/yr for ULVR.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMSN.L is traded in USD, while ULVR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ULVR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 149.32% return, which is significantly higher than ULVR.L's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has outperformed ULVR.L with an annualized return of 27.10%, while ULVR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.
SMSN.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 149.32%
- 6M
- 179.18%
- 1Y
- 379.61%
- 3Y*
- 57.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.51%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
ULVR.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -18.93%
- 1Y
- -18.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 149.32% | 130.81% | -37.94% | 38.34% | -31.32% | -8.01% | 60.01% | 41.56% | -25.35% | 62.93% |
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | -13.04% | 5.70% | 21.67% | -0.81% | -1.70% | -7.65% | 7.47% | 13.60% | -2.91% | 41.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMSN.L and ULVR.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SMSN.L and ULVR.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMSN.L:
$1.39T
ULVR.L:
£92.01B
SMSN.L:
$320.04K
ULVR.L:
£4.32
SMSN.L:
0.02
ULVR.L:
9.70
SMSN.L:
0.00
ULVR.L:
1.77
SMSN.L:
0.00
ULVR.L:
1.02
SMSN.L:
0.00
ULVR.L:
5.92
SMSN.L:
$389.99T
ULVR.L:
£96.17B
SMSN.L:
$152.35T
ULVR.L:
£42.43B
SMSN.L:
$68.67T
ULVR.L:
£20.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMSN.L
ULVR.L
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Unilever PLC (ULVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMSN.L | ULVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 0.88 | +0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.15 | -0.66 | +17.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.85 | -1.34 | +58.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMSN.L | ULVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44 | -0.71 | +8.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | -0.02 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.21 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.26 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, roughly equal to the maximum ULVR.L drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and ULVR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMSN.L | ULVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -53.22% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -27.41% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.52% | -27.41% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.12% | -27.41% | -21.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | -29.13% | -25.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.96% | -25.76% | +12.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -10.30% | -7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 13.46% | -6.84% |
Volatility
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Volatility Comparison
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a higher volatility of 23.24% compared to Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) at 5.58%. This indicates that SMSN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMSN.L | ULVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.24% | 5.58% | +17.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.27% | 19.82% | +23.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.70% | 25.49% | +25.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 20.97% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 21.16% | +11.72% |
Dividends
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Dividend Comparison
SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ULVR.L's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.37% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | 4.04% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 3.31% | 3.26% | 3.24% | 2.95% | 3.17% | 2.98% |
Financials
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMSN.L vs. ULVR.L - Profitability Comparison
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
ULVR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 20.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
ULVR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.16B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
ULVR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.58B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMSN.L and ULVR.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and ULVR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer