ULVR.L vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Performance
ULVR.L vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ULVR.L vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | -12.94% | 3.40% | 23.94% | -5.61% | 10.27% | -6.64% | 4.45% | 9.39% | 3.09% | 29.42% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.43% | -18.51% | 19.30% | -5.81% | 6.24% | 21.66% | 10.80% | 34.39% | 9.71% | 2.95% |
Different Trading Currencies
ULVR.L is traded in GBp, while PG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
ULVR.L:
£92.18B
PG:
$350.12B
ULVR.L:
£4.32
PG:
$6.75
ULVR.L:
9.72
PG:
21.39
ULVR.L:
1.77
PG:
5.23
ULVR.L:
1.02
PG:
4.13
ULVR.L:
5.93
PG:
6.57
ULVR.L:
£96.17B
PG:
$85.26B
ULVR.L:
£42.43B
PG:
$43.21B
ULVR.L:
£20.18B
PG:
$23.62B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVR.L achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ULVR.L has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 5.84%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.
ULVR.L
- 1D
- -7.28%
- 1M
- -23.19%
- YTD
- -12.94%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -11.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
PG
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -11.91%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVR.L vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
ULVR.L
PG
ULVR.L vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVR.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | -0.79 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | -1.02 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.89 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.66 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.89 | -1.14 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVR.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | -0.79 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.28 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.47 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVR.L and PG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ULVR.L vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ULVR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than PG's 2.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | 4.11% | 3.59% | 3.39% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.93% | 3.47% | 3.42% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.13% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.93% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Drawdowns
ULVR.L vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVR.L drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVR.L and PG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVR.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.35% | -54.25% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.19% | -18.31% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -23.77% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -23.77% | -7.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.19% | -16.91% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -12.15% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.46% | 9.85% | -3.39% |
Volatility
ULVR.L vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.97%. This indicates that ULVR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ULVR.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 5.97% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 13.97% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 18.99% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 17.91% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 20.05% | -0.25% |
Financials
ULVR.L vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULVR.L vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
ULVR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 20.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 11.37B and revenue of 22.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.
ULVR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.16B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 5.37B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
ULVR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.58B and revenue of 20.35B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 4.33B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.