ULVR.L vs. BN.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) and Danone S.A. (BN.PA).
Performance
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | -12.94% | 3.40% | 23.94% | -5.61% | 10.27% | -6.64% | 4.45% | 9.39% | 3.09% | 29.42% |
BN.PA Danone S.A. | -9.72% | 27.79% | 9.81% | 20.81% | -1.75% | -1.24% | -20.42% | 16.44% | -8.60% | 24.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
ULVR.L is traded in GBp, while BN.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BN.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVR.L achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly lower than BN.PA's -9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ULVR.L has outperformed BN.PA with an annualized return of 5.84%, while BN.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.32% annualized return.
ULVR.L
- 1D
- -7.28%
- 1M
- -23.19%
- YTD
- -12.94%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- 1Y
- -11.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
BN.PA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -9.72%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ULVR.L
BN.PA
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) and Danone S.A. (BN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVR.L | BN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | 0.21 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 0.47 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.05 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.89 | 0.14 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVR.L | BN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 0.21 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.38 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.26 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.23 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVR.L and BN.PA is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Dividend Comparison
ULVR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than BN.PA's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVR.L Unilever PLC | 4.11% | 3.59% | 3.39% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.93% | 3.47% | 3.42% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.13% |
BN.PA Danone S.A. | 3.11% | 2.80% | 3.22% | 3.41% | 3.94% | 3.55% | 3.91% | 2.63% | 3.09% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 2.41% |
Drawdowns
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVR.L drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, which is greater than BN.PA's maximum drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVR.L and BN.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVR.L | BN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.35% | -46.10% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.19% | -17.29% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -26.95% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -40.87% | +9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.19% | -13.27% | -9.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -14.14% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.46% | 7.04% | -0.58% |
Volatility
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Volatility Comparison
Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Danone S.A. (BN.PA) at 7.32%. This indicates that ULVR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BN.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ULVR.L | BN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 7.32% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 17.94% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 22.93% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 19.36% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 20.21% | -0.41% |
Financials
ULVR.L vs. BN.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and Danone S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities