SMSN.L vs. AMAT
SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SMSN.L in Consumer Electronics, AMAT in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L returned 27.99%/yr vs 38.86%/yr for AMAT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMSN.L achieves a 161.93% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 121.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SMSN.L has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 27.99%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.86% annualized return.
SMSN.L
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 13.49%
- YTD
- 161.93%
- 6M
- 204.19%
- 1Y
- 399.27%
- 3Y*
- 59.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 27.99%
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- YTD
- 121.28%
- 6M
- 119.38%
- 1Y
- 226.52%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- 38.86%
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 161.93% | 130.81% | -37.94% | 38.34% | -31.32% | -8.01% | 60.01% | 41.56% | -25.35% | 62.93% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 121.28% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMSN.L and AMAT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2006 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, SMSN.L and AMAT have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SMSN.L:
$1.46T
AMAT:
$453.23B
SMSN.L:
₩320.04K
AMAT:
$10.61
SMSN.L:
25.63
AMAT:
53.45
SMSN.L:
0.77
AMAT:
6.80
SMSN.L:
5.67
AMAT:
15.67
SMSN.L:
4.68
AMAT:
18.96
SMSN.L:
₩389.99T
AMAT:
$29.02B
SMSN.L:
₩152.35T
AMAT:
$14.21B
SMSN.L:
₩68.67T
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMSN.L vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
SMSN.L
AMAT
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMSN.L | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.59 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.03 | 10.67 | +7.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.94 | 30.41 | +27.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMSN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMSN.L and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMSN.L | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -85.22% | +29.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -21.37% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.52% | -49.88% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.12% | -55.14% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.44% | -55.14% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | 0.00% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -38.78% | +21.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 7.49% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) have volatilities of 20.71% and 20.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMSN.L | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.71% | 20.52% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.80% | 38.83% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.06% | 49.03% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 44.20% | -9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 42.94% | -9.99% |
Dividends
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
SMSN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than AMAT's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.35% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMSN.L vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMSN.L and AMAT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMSN.L and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer