SMR vs. QS
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) and QS (QuantumScape Corporation) are both stocks. SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while QS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, SMR returned -0.32%/yr vs -23.97%/yr for QS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -30.20% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -31.96% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
QS
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -18.13%
- YTD
- -31.96%
- 6M
- -39.92%
- 1Y
- 57.91%
- 3Y*
- -1.86%
- 5Y*
- -23.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SMR vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -31.96% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 45.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and QS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, SMR and QS have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SMR:
$3.16B
QS:
$4.33B
SMR:
-$2.02
QS:
-$0.72
SMR:
2.71
QS:
3.90
SMR:
$18.10M
QS:
$0.00
SMR:
$4.45M
QS:
-$49.03M
SMR:
-$696.20M
QS:
-$378.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
QS
SMR vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.19 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.86 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 1.33 | -2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, smaller than the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -97.36% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -67.68% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -73.93% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -91.45% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.49% | -94.62% | +13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.08% | -85.52% | +50.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.39% | 43.64% | +13.75% |
Volatility
SMR vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 28.93% compared to QuantumScape Corporation (QS) at 25.60%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.93% | 25.60% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.57% | 48.92% | +20.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.59% | 103.22% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.50% | 85.76% | +7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.31% | 105.87% | -16.56% |
Dividends
SMR vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMR nor QS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SMR vs. QS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NuScale Power Corporation and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and QS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to QS (25.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs QS's -97.36%.
QS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer