SMR vs. PPA
SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) is a stock, while PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Over the past 5 years, SMR returned -0.32%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for PPA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMR vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMR achieves a -30.20% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 11.20% return.
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -75.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PPA
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
SMR vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 11.20% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMR and PPA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMR vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
SMR
PPA
SMR vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMR | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.25 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 2.11 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 5.94 | -7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMR vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMR drawdown since its inception was -87.47%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMR and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMR | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.47% | -57.37% | -30.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.86% | -13.71% | -69.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.86% | -15.24% | -67.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.47% | -18.37% | -69.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.49% | -6.15% | -75.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.08% | -9.18% | -25.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.39% | 4.85% | +52.54% |
Volatility
SMR vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a higher volatility of 28.93% compared to Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) at 8.91%. This indicates that SMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMR | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.93% | 8.91% | +20.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.57% | 17.06% | +52.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.59% | 20.04% | +82.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.50% | 18.70% | +74.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.31% | 20.73% | +68.58% |
Dividends
SMR vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.38% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMR and PPA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to PPA (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMR dropped -87.47% vs PPA's -57.37%.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMR and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer